To:
"James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>
cc:
"Ayesha Damaraju" <ayesha.damaraju@neustar.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Fri, 09 Feb 2001 08:09:00 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Fri, 09 Feb 2001 13:18:45 +0800." <00b001c0926e$11bd9970$11daa5d2@jamessonyvaio>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Transfer Notification a requirement?
Mr. Seng, Your (repeated) suggestion that the scope of the working group extend to encompass the functionality of registrANT operations (below) has not yet addressed the mechanism(s) by which the provreg protocol's authentication, authorization, and presumably accounting activities scale. > This problem _could_ be solved in another way, ie, by having > authorization access directly on objects. This allows the > owner/registrant to do whatever he wants with the object including > transfer so long he can provide the appropriate authorization. Do you have any suggestions in this area at this time? Eric