To:
"Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>
Cc:
"James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>, "Kent Crispin" <kent@songbird.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Martin Oldfield <m@mail.tc>
Date:
Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:10:36 +0000 (GMT)
In-Reply-To:
<IPEMICCPDPPICMIONJIOEEPDCBAA.briansp@walid.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: draft-hollenbeck-grrp-reqs-06 [Was Re: Interim Meeting]
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian W Spolarich <briansp@walid.com> writes: --> snip <-- Brian> 3.4 Object Registration Brian> [1] Protocol MUST support registration of objects of Brian> multiple types, Brian> including domain names, nameservers, and domain contacts. I think saying objects here is a great improvement. However, to be pedantic if I wanted to set up a registry for pet registrations then I wouldn't want it to include any domain names. Would it be possible to explicitly cast the thing in two halves: the one is general and says `Protocol MUST support registration of objects of multiple types'; the other is domain specific and says `The objects supported must include domain names, nameservers, and domain contacts'. Then if people want to set up all sorts of other crazy registries there's a clear point-of-departure. --> snip <-- Cheers, -- Martin Oldfield, AdamsNames Ltd.