Re: WG Review: Provisioning Registry Protocol (provreg)

["James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>]

Yes, you may say you have generally agreement in this mailing list,
apparently comprises of a lot of people in the domain names industry (me
included).

However, I do wish to state my position that I still think the charter
focus is too focus on domain names registration only. But one person
should not stop you from submitting it to the IESG.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Lewis" <lewis@tislabs.com>
To: "James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>
Cc: "Paul George" <pgeorge@saraf.com>; <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 6:07 AM
Subject: Re: WG Review: Provisioning Registry Protocol (provreg)


> In summary - let's say we are in raging agreement as far as what the
> charter should be.  As far as what was put into the ietf-announce
message,
> that will be fixed one way or another.  (I may have sent the updated
one in
> too close to the conference call, so the older one was processed.)
Keep in
> mind that the IESG has the last say, so I can't guarantee anything,
but at
> this point I am willing to trust that the IESG will "do the right
thing
> (tm)."
>
> At 4:08 PM -0500 2/2/01, James Seng/Personal wrote:
> >Go take a look at the annoucement made by the IESG. It is obviously
not
> >there so somehow, somewhere, someone make a mistake.
> >
> >No, it is not too late to give them an update copy. In fact, there is
no
> >such thing as too late.
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
> Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: lewis@tislabs.com
>
> Dilbert is an optimist.
>
> Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.
>
>