To:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Alf Hansen" <Alf.Hansen@uninett.no>
Date:
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:12:08 +0100
Importance:
Normal
In-Reply-To:
<OFAC2D5025.25A9D265-ONC12569CA.004E9BA4@denic.de>
Reply-To:
<Alf.Hansen@uninett.no>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Definition of Registry
Hi, Who is responsible for the content if the Registry is not? Will each Registrar instead be responsible for his part of the database? What then if a customer moves from one Registrar to another? Best regards, Alf H .NO > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se]On > Behalf Of Marcos Sanz/Denic > Sent: 4. januar 2001 15:24 > To: Jaap Akkerhuis > Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: Re: Re: Defenition of Registry > > > On 04.01.01 14:19 Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@sidn.nl> wrote: > > I would leave it the way it was. This ``maintaining the intergrity > > of repository content'' is way too strong. How can the registry be > > resposible if the registrat is given wrong data? Are they still > > resposible? This will give lawyers new business opportunities. > > Agree with Jaap. It depends upon what does here "integrity" mean. > I can guarantee they satisfy "integrity" but you bet I will not make any > assertion about its "veracity". > > Marcos Sanz (.de registry)