To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
cc:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:10:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<DF737E620579D411A8E400D0B77E671D75041C@regdom-ex01.prod.netsol.com>
Reply-To:
Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: provreg mailing list LAST CALL: charter
> Would adding an explicit reference in the charter to the requirements > document (which includes requirements for supporting both IPv4 and IPv6) as > Ed suggested cover your concern? It really doesn't matter to me where it goes as long as we remember to make sure we can handle customer/client/registrants who happen to want to have some IPv6 based name servers for their domain name. --karl--