To:
"'Karl Auerbach'" <karl@CaveBear.com>, Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jan 2001 13:40:59 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: provreg mailing list LAST CALL: charter
Karl, Would adding an explicit reference in the charter to the requirements document (which includes requirements for supporting both IPv4 and IPv6) as Ed suggested cover your concern? Scott Hollenbeck VeriSign Global Registry Services -----Original Message----- From: Karl Auerbach [mailto:karl@CaveBear.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 1:29 PM To: Edward Lewis Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se Subject: Re: provreg mailing list LAST CALL: charter > I am issuing a last call for comments on the charter, which Dave Crocker > most recently submitted on Tue, 02 Jan 2001 09:31:03 -0800. The last call > expires at 9am (-0500) Tueday, January 9. Should the charter mention IPv6, in particular the need to carry IPv6 addresses in addition to IPv4 ones as name server data in the protocol payloads? --karl--