RE: provreg mailing list LAST CALL: charter

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

OK, in that case I think we have it covered because support for IPv6 name
server addressing is covered in sections 1.1 and 3.4 of the requirements
draft.  The next version of the draft will modify section 3.4 a tad to
explicitly mention both IPv4 and IPv6 instead of depending on the definition
of "IP Address" from section 1.1.

Scott Hollenbeck
VeriSign Global Registry Services

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Auerbach [mailto:karl@CaveBear.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 3:10 PM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: Edward Lewis; ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: provreg mailing list LAST CALL: charter



> Would adding an explicit reference in the charter to the requirements
> document (which includes requirements for supporting both IPv4 and IPv6)
as
> Ed suggested cover your concern?

It really doesn't matter to me where it goes as long as we remember to
make sure we can handle customer/client/registrants who happen to want to
have some IPv6 based name servers for their domain name.

		--karl--