To:
"J. William Semich" <bsemich@worldnames.net>, "'provreg List'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>
Date:
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:25:10 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<3.0.5.32.20001221102150.03d16630@mail.nic.nu>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Scope [was Re: Expiration times]
At 10:21 AM 12/21/2000 -0500, J. William Semich wrote: >Verisign has launched a testbed registry for ENUM type identifiers >(www.enumworld.com). Scott, would the above proposed provision for a >"broader range of identifiers" be one way to accommodate ENUM registry >activity, or would 7.5-[1] be adequate? An "ENUM type identifier" is still a domain name--there just happens to be a mapping between that domain name and an E.164 number. Even if the requirements only talked about domain names, they'd still cover ENUM. Jordyn