To:
SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro <yasuhiro@nttv6.jp>
CC:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:09:25 +0900
In-Reply-To:
<20031111.065605.74687182.yasuhiro@nttv6.jp>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Subject:
Re: Sense of the WG on DNS discovery
SHIRASAKI san; >>>So we've used 'Well known "site-local" unicast addresses' in our ADSL >>>service since the summer of 2002, but traditional site-local unicast >>>address is expected to be deprecated soon... >> >>Of course, site-local addresses (either uni- or multi- cast) are >>almost as bad as "stateelss" that they should be, if not yet, >>deprecated. >> >>Have you read the draft? > I've just missed your draft Thanks. > and thought you've been talking about > site-local anycast, but now I read your draft and thought it might work, > once IANA assgins addresses. It should be noted that, technically, defact standard addresses (extracted from an address space of a large PC vendor) are enough, though it is politically easier to mention IANA. :-) Masataka Ohta #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.