To:
"Rob Austein" <sra+dnsop@hactrn.net>, <dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
"BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE" <luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com>
Date:
Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:01:21 +0100
content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcOkt6S+fXFdh9qSQwufZ73iXNzElgAmDjHA
Thread-Topic:
Sense of the WG on DNS discovery
Subject:
RE: Sense of the WG on DNS discovery
Hi all, > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Rob Austein [mailto:sra+dnsop@hactrn.net] > > > At Fri, 07 Nov 2003 06:46:19 +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote: > > > > I still think there's a difference in the default query propegation > behavior for a badly configured network, if that's what you're asking. > Whether that's relevant to anything the WG cares about is for the WG > to decide. > Rob, I do think that "badly configured network" is an operational issue. Is your point that "this possibility" is more dangerous than possible operational issues of other methods, and thus you think that well-known address method should not be used ? I hope I'm clear... I'm trying to understand ;+) regards, Luc #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.