To:
<luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com>, <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>, <dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
<matthew.ford@bt.com>
Date:
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:27:50 -0000
Content-Class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
thread-index:
AcOj3e6ZUHD5drwKQfW95VSJI5sc9AAXuU/AAACmuBA=
Thread-Topic:
How IPv6 host gets DNS address
Subject:
RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
> -----Original Message----- > From: BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE [mailto:luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com] > Sent: 06 November 2003 08:10 > > Of course, this is just a subjective impression, but I believe the > > implementation complexity should be measured by implementors, not > > (mainly) by protocol designers who do not implement it. > > Yes I agree with you, and the complexity measurement should > also be done by users ;+) I don't understand this at all. If by 'users' you mean end-users of the network, then any solution here has to 'Just Work (tm)'. If by 'users' you mean operators of the network, then I don't see any difference between plugging recursive name server parameters into a DHCPv6(lite) server or into a router for advertisement in an RA. Mat #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.