To:
<luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com>, <rdroms@cisco.com>, <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
<matthew.ford@bt.com>
Date:
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:35:19 -0000
Content-Class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
thread-index:
AcOkHDAinvfMaVSARKKRcb8D3/QuYQAIT09gAACt/bA=
Thread-Topic:
How IPv6 host gets DNS address
Subject:
RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
> -----Original Message----- > From: BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE [mailto:luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com] > Sent: 06 November 2003 08:17 > I agree with Ralph, in some deployement model, DHCPv6 is the > right solution to be deployed. But I also believe that some > other deployment models would prefer other solution like a ND > model + a simple way to discover DNS resolvers addresses > (DHCPv6-lite, well-known addresses or RA-based solution). Let's not confuse matters. Ralph's statement was referring to the use of DHCPv6 for address assignment. The discussion about appropriate/desirable solutions for recursive name server discovery is unrelated to that. Mat #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.