RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address

["BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE" <luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com>]

ok Matt, thanks for the clarification.

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : matthew.ford@bt.com [mailto:matthew.ford@bt.com]
> Envoye : jeudi 6 novembre 2003 09:35
> A : BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE; rdroms@cisco.com;
> mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
> Cc : dnsop@cafax.se
> Objet : RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE 
> [mailto:luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com] 
> > Sent: 06 November 2003 08:17
> 
> > I agree with Ralph, in some deployement model, DHCPv6 is the 
> > right solution to be deployed. But I also believe that some 
> > other deployment models would prefer other solution like a ND 
> > model + a simple way to discover DNS resolvers addresses 
> > (DHCPv6-lite, well-known addresses or RA-based solution).
> 
> Let's not confuse matters. Ralph's statement was referring to 
> the use of
> DHCPv6 for address assignment. The discussion about
> appropriate/desirable solutions for recursive name server discovery is
> unrelated to that.
> 
> Mat
> 

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.