To:
<bob.hinden@nokia.com>
Cc:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
<matthew.ford@bt.com>
Date:
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:21:29 -0000
Content-Class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
thread-index:
AcOkBfW9KkEjttXLQiel0R1g1UN66wAOEYbA
Thread-Topic:
How IPv6 host gets DNS address
Subject:
RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hinden@nokia.com] > Sent: 06 November 2003 01:32 > >FWIW I agree with Ralph and Jinmei here. I have not seen any > sensible > >argument as to why DHCPv6 is not the solution here. > > I think the question might be better stated as why does > DHCPv6 have to be the only solution to this problem. It's > clear that DHCPv6 is a solution. The debate seems to be can > there be other solutions as well (e.g., a Router > Advertisement solution). From what I see, there are a > significant number of people who would like to see other > solutions in addition to DHCPv6. Hi Bob, From my perspective DHCPv6 has to be the only solution because multiple solutions equals more complexity. I don't see any benefit to the operator community from multiple solutions to this problem. Mat #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.