To:
"Ralph Droms" <rdroms@cisco.com>, "masataka ohta" <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
"BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE" <luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com>
Date:
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:16:45 +0100
content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcOkHDAinvfMaVSARKKRcb8D3/QuYQAIT09g
Thread-Topic:
How IPv6 host gets DNS address
Subject:
RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
> -----Message d'origine----- > De : Ralph Droms [mailto:rdroms@cisco.com] > > Ohta-san, > > > I believe there are some sites who have come to the > conclusion that DHCPv6 > address assignment is the right deployment model, exactly > because it avoids > the PTR record problem as well as giving network > administrators reliable > information about mappings between devices and IPv6 addresses. > > - Ralph > I agree with Ralph, in some deployement model, DHCPv6 is the right solution to be deployed. But I also believe that some other deployment models would prefer other solution like a ND model + a simple way to discover DNS resolvers addresses (DHCPv6-lite, well-known addresses or RA-based solution). Luc #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.