To:
<jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>, <rdroms@cisco.com>
Cc:
<dnsop@cafax.se>
From:
<matthew.ford@bt.com>
Date:
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:31:23 -0000
Content-Class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
thread-index:
AcOjz+Fgn8f7QtL9S8GebXL9AJUhlAAA1arg
Thread-Topic:
How IPv6 host gets DNS address
Subject:
RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address
> dhcpv6-stateless-01 is a reasonable compromise. I don't > think the fact the current shape of the specification is not > ideal (IMO) can be a reason to take DHCPv6 as "the" method > for DNS recursing sever discovery. I guess there should be a 'not' in there somewhere ;-) Double negatives can be confusing! :-) FWIW I agree with Ralph and Jinmei here. I have not seen any sensible argument as to why DHCPv6 is not the solution here. ----- Mat #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.