[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE <luc.beloeil@francetelecom.com>
CC: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>, dnsop@cafax.se
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:07:10 +0859 ()
In-Reply-To: <C331E5A29B51A84E9755E834A3E619D10F9F6C@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>from BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE at "Jul 28, 2003 05:03:33 pm"
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: proposal for a compromise on DNS discovery

Luc;

> There was a analysis made by the DNS Discovery Design Team in march 2001
> (draft-ietf-ipnwg-dns-discovery-01.txt). Wouldn't it be valuable to go
> on or to restart such a work ? (instead of this no-end battle?) I must
> have missed something concerning this old work.

What has been missing is a clear definition on the requirement.

Lacking it, IPv6 WG has been poorly managed that its past work
is not only useless but also harmful.

							Masataka Ohta
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.

Home | Date list | Subject list