To:
Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
Cc:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date:
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 03:28:48 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<5.2.1.1.2.20030429200615.01b9e6a0@mail.amaranth.net>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-serverid-01.txt
At 8:58 PM -0400 2003/04/29, Daniel Senie wrote:
> I agree with you. The only way I see to provide information about
> the server that provided the response would be to include that
> information in the additional section of the response. Since the
> additional section would not normally contain whatever record we
> might add to express this, we would certainly learn just how
> liberal servers are in what they receive.
Hmm. That's a cool idea -- use the additional section, perhaps
with a TXT record containing the unique identifier information for
the particular server in question.
I like it. I'm not sure, but I don't think it would require any
protocol modifications, but we'd definitely want to give it some
pretty extensive field testing first.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.