To:
Kevin Darcy <kcd@daimlerchrysler.com>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date:
Fri, 11 Apr 2003 02:49:41 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<3E95EC41.B110DEA0@daimlerchrysler.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-04.txt
At 6:12 PM -0400 2003/04/10, Kevin Darcy wrote:
>> Reverse DNS is not the sole arbiter of what is good and what is
>> not, and should not be treated as such. It remains a useful tool.
>
> For leaf nodes at least, the cost of its abuses outweighs the benefits of its
> uses. IMO.
Perhaps. Perhaps not. In your sphere of influence, you get to
make that decision. However, neither you nor anyone else should be
making the decision to prohibit others from making their own decision
in this regard.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.