To:
Kevin Darcy <kcd@daimlerchrysler.com>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date:
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:41:45 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<3E958F75.8177B781@daimlerchrysler.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-04.txt
At 11:36 AM -0400 2003/04/10, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> Come on, let's not dance around the point here. Either reverse DNS
>is bogus or
> it isn't. We should say what we mean and mean what we say. Dithering gets us
> nowhere.
Reverse DNS is not the sole arbiter of what is good and what is
not, and should not be treated as such. It remains a useful tool.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.