Re: RR DNS and spam

[Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>]

Just like that. POP finally found a use, though.

Historical note, I don't think it was dialin that got POP going, it was
client server computing and PC's that made POP attractive.  I remember
trying to get users with unix workstations to use POP. We had to use a
program called snarfmail. Snarfmail was a pop client that put mail in
/usr/spool/mail, as though it had been received by sendmail, where Unix
mail and mh could pick it up.

		--Dean

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Markus Stumpf wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:06:44PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
> > Ah, you mean RFC 2476. 2476 is a _proposed_ standard. Since it hasn't
> > moved since 1998, I think it is a _dead_ proposed standard.  It is just
> > another in a list of gratuitous changes that are shown by experience to be
> > a waste of time and effort, as their proponents tilt at windmills trying
> > to invent a protocol which can't be subjected to abuse and will prevent
> > human behavior.
>
> Yeah, just like POP (3) which was invented in Oktober 1984 and was
> "dead" for 10 years until "suddenly" with the rush of dialin users
> it became a desperately needed protocol to access mailboxes.
>
> Or like FSP which's principle was reinvented by P2P.
>
> 	\Maex
>
> --
> SpaceNet AG            | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
> Research & Development |       D-80807 Muenchen    | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
> "The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
>  proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"
> #----------------------------------------------------------------------
> # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.
>

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.