To:
Danny Mayer <mayer@gis.net>, Mohsen Souissi <Mohsen.Souissi@nic.fr>, dnsop@cafax.se, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Cc:
vladimir ksinant <vladimir.ksinant@6wind.com>, RFC1886 Interop tests <rfc1886@nic.fr>, g6@g6.asso.fr
From:
Ólafur Guðmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Date:
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:57:28 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<4.3.1.2.20020714211757.00e89480@pop.gis.net>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: RFC 1886 Interop Tests & Results
At 09:22 PM 7/14/2002, Danny Mayer wrote:
>At 07:25 AM 7/14/02, Mohsen Souissi wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>Upon request from Alain Durand (Co-Chair of ngtrans wg) and Olafur
>>Gudmundsson (Co-chair of dnsext wg), 6WIND, AFNIC, France Telecom R&D
>>and IRISA (as members of G6) organized RFC1886 interop tests in last
>>June-July 2002.
>
>Two comments:
>1) The data is most peculiar since nowhere that I could find are X, Y and Z
>identified. If they are somewhere I couldn't find it. Is there a reason
>to keep
>them obscured?
This is standard procedure in DNSEXT interop testing and reporting.
The vendors have access to the full reports and I have been in contact
with the vendor that "failed" additional section processing and they
will fix this in their next release.
Olafur