To:
dnsop@cafax.se, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Cc:
vladimir ksinant <vladimir.ksinant@6wind.com>, RFC1886 Interop tests <rfc1886@nic.fr>, g6@g6.asso.fr
From:
Mohsen Souissi <Mohsen.Souissi@nic.fr>
Date:
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:25:35 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<3D2EA251.D9CBA0A0@6wind.com>; from vladimir.ksinant@6wind.com on Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:33:05AM +0100
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Subject:
RFC 1886 Interop Tests & Results
Hello, Upon request from Alain Durand (Co-Chair of ngtrans wg) and Olafur Gudmundsson (Co-chair of dnsext wg), 6WIND, AFNIC, France Telecom R&D and IRISA (as members of G6) organized RFC1886 interop tests in last June-July 2002. Three well-known server implementations and 2 resolver implementations were used. The results are : - 2 server implementations are fully interoperable as defined in RFC1886 (section 2 and section 3). - The two resolvers have identical behaviors and are correct. - A third server is partially in conformity with RFC 1886: it does not perform correctly additional section processing (section 3 of RFC1886) for MX, SRV, NS and SOA . The description and results of the tests are now online: IPv4 : http://www.6wind.com/RFC1886/testRFC1886.html IPv6 : http://www.ipv6.6wind.com/standard/testRFC1886.html All comments/questions (which may be sent to rfc1886@nic.fr) will be welcome. Cheers, Mohsen (for RFC1886 Interop tests team). P.S. I apologize beforehand for possible multiple copies.