To:
itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino), Mohsen.Souissi@nic.fr
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, vladimir.ksinant@6wind.com, rfc1886@nic.fr, g6@g6.asso.fr
From:
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Date:
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:10:44 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<20020714213532.84B6E4B22@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: RFC 1886 Interop Tests & Results
At 6:35 AM +0900 2002/07/15, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> the co-existence of ip6.int and ip6.arpa tree will require us to:
> query ip6.arpa;
> if (no record)
> query ip6.int;
> for backward compatibility. was it taken into account, or did you
> test just "ip6.arpa" lookups?
I checked the source code for BIND 9.2.1, and IIRC it checks
ip6.int first and then ip6.arpa second. This allows us to stand up
ip6.arpa whenever, and then once that is set, we can tear down
ip6.int.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.