To:
ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
"David R. Conrad" <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Date:
Thu, 09 Aug 2001 14:46:15 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<20010809200502.2501.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary
Dan, I know it is hard when you're so busy lying about "The BIND Company", but do try to keep up. I was responding to a message that said A6 makes renumbering trivial. I was suggesting that the real renumbering problem can't be solved just in the DNS. It would, at best, solve only a portion of the problem. However, please continue to remove context and misrepresent -- you do it so well. Rgds, -drc At 08:05 PM 8/9/2001 +0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote: >David R. Conrad writes: > > But it wouldn't be since addresses are embedded in (manually edited) > > configuration files, filter lists, etc. > >What relevance does this have to the topic at hand? > >If you want to change the software to look up addresses in DNS, go >ahead. A6 doesn't make this any easier. > >---Dan >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List >IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng >FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng >Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com >--------------------------------------------------------------------