To:
alexis@nlnetlabs.nl
cc:
Jim Bound <seamus@bit-net.com>, Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
James Aldridge <jhma@KPNQwest.net>
Date:
Tue, 07 Aug 2001 17:22:37 +0200
In-reply-to:
Your message of "Tue, 07 Aug 2001 16:23:52 +0200." <200108071423.f77ENqd68433@open.nlnetlabs.nl>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary
Alexis Yushin wrote: > I see a big difference between deprecating/moving to historic and changing > status to experimental. Experemental implies further development. I think that "implies" might be a bit strong - "permits" might be more appropriate (just check rfc-index.txt for all those ancient "experimental" RFCs). But, yes, I do recognise the difference. James