To:
James Aldridge <jhma@KPNQwest.net>
CC:
alexis@nlnetlabs.nl, Jim Bound <seamus@bit-net.com>, Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Alexis Yushin <alexis@nlnetlabs.nl>
Date:
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 18:40:09 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To:
<E15U8go-0000uf-00@aegir.EU.net> "from James Aldridge at Aug 7,2001 05:22:37 pm"
Reply-To:
alexis@nlnetlabs.nl
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS summary
Once James Aldridge wrote: >Alexis Yushin wrote: >> I see a big difference between deprecating/moving to historic and changing >> status to experimental. Experemental implies further development. > >I think that "implies" might be a bit strong - "permits" might be more >appropriate (just check rfc-index.txt for all those ancient "experimental" >RFCs). But, yes, I do recognise the difference. Well, to be more specific we do plan on doing quite some more research and testing in the A6 area. (We as in NLnet Labs) Alexis