To:
"David R. Conrad" <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Cc:
Bill Manning <bmanning@zed.isi.edu>, peter@gradwell.com (Peter Gradwell), dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Randy Bush <rbush@bainbridge.verio.net>
Date:
Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:57:41 -0800
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Commercial Advantages of Hosting Name Servers
bill said they would, but did not substantiate this with the merest example. hard to provide a counterexample to a non-existent example. but, to make trouble, as a competitor, i would have no problem with, e.g., uunet having a root server near its edge with its peers. randy, who likes having money near mouths > Are you suggesting that marketing folk would not take advantage of such a > situation? > > Rgds, > -drc > > At 04:23 PM 12/10/2000 -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > > % If a name server is hosted with an ISP, does that give the ISP a > > commercial > > > % advantage in anyway, for example, in marketing, or in negotiating peering > > > % agreements, or similar? > > > > > > Yes, hosting a server does provide a commercial advantage. There > > > is no way to escape it. > > > > > > This concern was what drove the placement of the four additional > > > root servers that were created in 1995. Many ISPs expressed > > > interest in hosting. The principle reason was that it provided > > > a competative advantage, hence the model that was chosen was to > > > have one entity, usually a membership or constituency based > > > entity operate the node, with physical placement being directed > > > by short RTTs within a region and good connectivity to the > > > other servers for the domain. > > > >i can't find the part of your message which describes the commercial > >advantage. > > > >randy >