To:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Bill Manning <bmanning@zed.isi.edu>
Cc:
peter@gradwell.com (Peter Gradwell), dnsop@cafax.se
From:
"David R. Conrad" <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Date:
Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:50:37 -0800
In-Reply-To:
<E145Gky-0000OW-00@roam.psg.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Commercial Advantages of Hosting Name Servers
Randy, Are you suggesting that marketing folk would not take advantage of such a situation? Rgds, -drc At 04:23 PM 12/10/2000 -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > % If a name server is hosted with an ISP, does that give the ISP a > commercial > > % advantage in anyway, for example, in marketing, or in negotiating peering > > % agreements, or similar? > > > > Yes, hosting a server does provide a commercial advantage. There > > is no way to escape it. > > > > This concern was what drove the placement of the four additional > > root servers that were created in 1995. Many ISPs expressed > > interest in hosting. The principle reason was that it provided > > a competative advantage, hence the model that was chosen was to > > have one entity, usually a membership or constituency based > > entity operate the node, with physical placement being directed > > by short RTTs within a region and good connectivity to the > > other servers for the domain. > >i can't find the part of your message which describes the commercial >advantage. > >randy