To:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
cc:
Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>, Lars-Johan Liman <liman@sunet.se>, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Ray Plzak <plzak@nic.mil>
Date:
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:20:08 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To:
<v0313030eb5bf17f171c6@[199.171.39.24]>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: wrt: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-00.txt
I agree with Ed in regards to BCP or Informational. The justification needs to be strong in either efficent performance or security. Ray On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Edward Lewis wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:57:22 -0400 > From: Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com> > To: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com> > Cc: Lars-Johan Liman <liman@sunet.se>, dnsop@cafax.se > Subject: Re: wrt: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-00.txt > > > If the document justifies the need for rev-map, then this is a BCP. Else, > it is headed for informational. > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Edward Lewis NAI Labs > Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com > > "It takes years of training to know when to do nothing" - Dogbert > > Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer. > > >