To:
tal@research.bell-labs.com (Tom Limoncelli)
Cc:
mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp, Harald@Alvestrand.no, namedroppers@internic.net, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date:
Wed, 29 Sep 99 11:04:41 JST
In-Reply-To:
<37F16F17.9D47E1E@research.bell-labs.com>; from "Tom Limoncelli" at Sep 28, 99 9:44 pm
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: IANA, DNS names, URL names...
Tom; > However, it is not clear what we are to infer from this. Your statement "URLREG > WG is useless" made on this mailing list isn't a clear conclusion. FYI, just recently, there was a pointless discussion on "tv" URL in IETF list. People in URL WG seemingly think URL names something special. > One might > also conclude "IANA must be extended to support the registration of <scheme> > strings so conflicts are not created." That's not against my point. Masataka Ohta