Re: Order in the working-group!

[hardie@equinix.com]

I hadn't seen the draft; thanks for pointing it out.  It doesn't go
into a great of detail about their deployment experience, but it does
indicate that they have deployed a system using of the same basic
ideas.  Their aim not to leak the shared unicast address is a bit
different, though, and some of the implied methods might have a a
significant performance hit.
			regards,
				Ted Hardie




> On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 09:50:39PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> > As was discussed in MInneapolis, the source of possible problem is
> > advertisement of shared addreses, not unique ones.
> 
> On a somewhat related note, has anyone looked at
> draft-catalone-rockell-hadns-00.txt?  (Implementation of a High
> Availability DNS System, by G. Catalone and R. Rockell, from Sprint.)
> 
> Seems to me to share some ideas with
> draft-ietf-dnsop-shared-root-server-01.txt except it considers caching
> servers meeting local demand from within the AS, instead of root servers.
> 
> Perhaps the general principle of local address announcements for DNS
> servers is useful enough that both aspects can be considered at once?
> 
> -- Andras Salamon                   andras@dns.net
>