To:
"'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@nic-naa.net>, "'Ram Mohan'" <rmohan@afilias.info>
Cc:
"'Hollenbeck, Scott'" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Michael Young" <myoung@libertyrms.info>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:11:43 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<200401211534.i0LFYsCA083395@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcPgNIfu6DpCvVqzTZKOe5Fke7dzDwABBRUg
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] Hi
Hey all I can say is I am innocent and officially spoofed. By the way its pronounced "cat ver pemmed" as the w is considered silent. :-) Michael Young -----Original Message----- From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se] On Behalf Of Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine Sent: January 21, 2004 10:35 AM To: Ram Mohan Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott; Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine; 'Edward Lewis'; ietf-provreg@cafax.se; brunner@nic-naa.net Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] Hi > He was neither online at the time of the mail, nor were any of the > computers he uses in a normal manner online. I once toyed with the idea of writing conformance tests for network devices that were powered off, extending the cluekit for 1022/1023 conformance tests. Thanks for pointing out the category of tests for unpowered or detached nodes to originate or relay SMTP state and date. Now, how do you folks at afilias say "cwatwvrpymnd"? Enquiring minds want to know. Thanks in advance Ram. Eric