To:
"Ram Mohan" <rmohan@afilias.info>
cc:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@nic-naa.net>, "'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, brunner@nic-naa.net
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:54 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:49:13 EST." <044001c3e02d$bd8b02a0$4402a8c0@afilias.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Hi
> He was neither online at the time of the mail, nor were any of the computers > he uses in a normal manner online. I once toyed with the idea of writing conformance tests for network devices that were powered off, extending the cluekit for 1022/1023 conformance tests. Thanks for pointing out the category of tests for unpowered or detached nodes to originate or relay SMTP state and date. Now, how do you folks at afilias say "cwatwvrpymnd"? Enquiring minds want to know. Thanks in advance Ram. Eric