[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: <dnssec@cafax.se>
From: "Scott Rose" <scottr@antd.nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:20:21 -0500
Sender: owner-dnssec@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Where are we (metaphorically speaking)?

Speaking of where we are (and where we are going):  Are we planning on
another "DNSSEC pow-wow" during IETF?

Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Manning" <bmanning@zed.isi.edu>
To: "Edward Lewis" <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc: <dnssec@cafax.se>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: Where are we (metaphorically speaking)?


> > 1) Securing the tree
> >
> > Issue #3
> >
> > Adoption approaches.  This refers to unsigned records and "opt-in."
> > Haven't heard a lot on this in recent months.
>
>
> Does this cover "gaps" in the validation heirarchy?
>
> > 2) Support for applications
> >
> Michael Richardsons draft was done outside the DNSSEC community.
>
> > 3) Operational considerations
> >
> > Issue #7
> >
> > Root zone key management issues.  (Root server engineers.)
>
> Being worked on. Have a working process for TSIG generation &
> rollover.  Testing of other issues is ongoing with the OTDR
> project. (When will we see IAN? :)
>
>
> > Issue #8
> >
> > Updating crypto-specifications.   I.e., change from HMAC-MD5 to
HMAC-SHA-1,
> > updates to DSA and Diffie Hellman.
>
> The FreeSwan folks want RSA. The larger issue would be how to discover
> and use differences in crypto-specs used between zones.
>
> > Issue #10
> >
> > DNSSEC interactions with Dynamic Update.  Resigning zone data that
hasn't
> > been refreshed versus dropping data with expired signatures.
>
> Rumour has it that there is a closed testing session to be
> held post-RIPE in January that will touch on this very issue.
>
> --bill


Home | Date list | Subject list