To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Kevin Darcy <kcd@daimlerchrysler.com>
Date:
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:10:48 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<a05200f10baa50d3b89d0@[10.0.1.2]>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
Subject:
Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6.
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 12:48 PM -0500 2003/03/24, Kevin Darcy wrote:
>
>> And what, exactly, qualifies you to be the mouthpiece for this
>> "silent constituency"?
>
>
> Because I care, and I've got a skin thicker than you or anyone
> else can penetrate.
Whatever. I haven't even _tried_ to penetrate your skin. Did you think I
had?
>> If anyone has valid uses for reverse DNS,
>> I say let them speak for themselves.
>
>
> Which they (and others I was not aware of) have done.
And all of those allegedly "legitimate" uses have turned out to be
doable better -- more securely, more reliably, whatever -- in other ways
besides end-node reverse DNS. Got anything new to add to the discussion?
- Kevin
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.