[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: James Gould <jgould@verisign.com>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
From: Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:56:25 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1267707390; x=1299243390; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk|Subject:=20Re:=20[ietf -provreg]=20RFC4310bis=20document=20writeup|Date:=20Thu, =204=20Mar=202010=2012:56:25=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<OFF84 87F1C.2A4724F8-ON802576DC.00470364-802576DC.00471565@nomi net.org.uk>|To:=20James=20Gould=20<jgould@verisign.com> |Cc:=20iesg@ietf.org,=0D=0A=09EPP=20Provreg=20<ietf-provr eg@cafax.se>,=0D=0A=09Olafur=20Gudmundsson=20<ogud@ogud.c om>|MIME-Version:=201.0|In-Reply-To:=20<C7B516F3.37D43%jg ould@verisign.com>|References:=20<OF243C1A54.4DCC81EB-ON8 02576DC.00311330-802576DC.00323207@nominet.org.uk>=20<C7B 516F3.37D43%jgould@verisign.com>; bh=3MH4DfBDmZz+oWaz5tkawX/Mh0XfrzEyS3oXcVOMBnU=; b=qbqGJeoMjN/hz7svsE5z6LLd6Rbe1hlJnucMtRLXiSR1/qruQ/2pIJ8H Z8kfck4+++IfL6gLbGT4TpEsBKQEmsMr9kQTZAUmCL5TVYPsBE+wHO+5V +1LBJbzJqSlgFkw;
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc: Subject:MIME-Version:X-Mailer:Message-ID:From:Date: X-MIMETrack:Content-Type; b=OsIoy/pWgDjMBgw6JiXw03xH9OeFnGu6dh37QjzKvylhe6lQxe0tR3kw My1IVPVewpVwTEnwZqaRbwC76d9qBI7oXia6sl3YVoBN16xMxrdLVECk6 QN7+HPw1rmq/Z8E;
In-Reply-To: <C7B516F3.37D43%jgould@verisign.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] RFC4310bis document writeup


> The last sentence “The server MUST return an EPP error result code
> of 2306 if the server receives a command using an unsupported
> interface“ of section 4 was added to address your feedback below.


Thanks - that makes sense.

> The remainder of the updates in section 4 was made to address Alex’s
> Nit review feedback.  

Was Alex's feedback on-list?   I don't see a copy anywhere.

kind regards,

Ray

Home | Date list | Subject list