RE: [ietf-provreg] RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

True, but it doesn't take much work to find out that there is work in progress.  New draft announcements are part of the process.  There are also multiple links to both current and old work on the IETF web site for anyone who takes the time to look:

 

Concluded working groups:

http://www.ietf.org/wg/concluded/

 

Working group mailing lists:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/list/wg/

 

Even a google search on "Extensible Provisioning Protocol" will turn up links to new work done since the working group closed.

 

Scott

---

From: Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk [mailto:Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 7:53 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: Alexey Melnikov; EPP Provreg
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol

 
> All individual submission work that happened after the group closed was
> done in complete accordance with IETF procedures, with appropriate
> public announcements, using the agreed-upon mailing list.  Responsible
> "stakeholders" have a responsibility to stay involved, Bernie.

New stakeholders also have to find out how to _get_ involved.

As a relative newbie to the IETF world (and only being employed in the registry business since late 2007) I only found out about this group by accident when I spotted the earlier EPPbis documents in the "new drafts" RSS feed.

kind regards,

Ray