To:
Ulrich Wisser <liste@publisher.de>
CC:
EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Date:
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:53:18 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<4B5FFEFE.3090304@publisher.de>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100124 Shredder/3.0.2pre
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
On 27/01/10 09:53, Ulrich Wisser wrote: > Hi, > Hi, > when discussing 4310bis we did focus very much on backward > compatibility. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. But by making the > old style rem command optional we break exactly the one thing we were > aiming for. Hmm. I am quite sure that the current version of 4310bis allows the processing of all valid 4310 requests. > > After some discussions with registrars and my colleagues, we came to the > conclusion that a new URI would be a better solution. The server could > support both versions of the protocol (and therefor not break old > clients) and clients would know which interface to use. Agreed. > > If we change the URI, I propose to drop backward compatibility and get > rid of the old style rem. This is a valid option, but it throws us back nearly to the beginning of the discussion. But if it's worth... > > /Ulrich Regards, Klaus -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se