[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:31:52 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a06240800c784ea68c235@[10.31.200.236]>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] Revision of 4310

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:56:12PM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
> I am not sure what active/inactive means.

Yeah, I don't know if this is the best term.  Before we go fine-tuning
the terminology, however, we prolly oughta figure out whether this is
worth doing.

> 1) published/not-published in the parent zone

Like James, I can see no reason to have two ways to do this.

> 2) tthe corresponding DNSKEY is published/not-published in the child zone

I can see a reason to do this.

> 3) that the DNSKEY set in the child zone is signed/not-signed by the  
> corresponding private key.

I don't think I understand this one.  Do you mean that there's no
RRSIG for that DNSKEY record?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se


Home | Date list | Subject list