To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Date:
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:31:52 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<a06240800c784ea68c235@[10.31.200.236]>
Mail-Followup-To:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Revision of 4310
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:56:12PM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote: > I am not sure what active/inactive means. Yeah, I don't know if this is the best term. Before we go fine-tuning the terminology, however, we prolly oughta figure out whether this is worth doing. > 1) published/not-published in the parent zone Like James, I can see no reason to have two ways to do this. > 2) tthe corresponding DNSKEY is published/not-published in the child zone I can see a reason to do this. > 3) that the DNSKEY set in the child zone is signed/not-signed by the > corresponding private key. I don't think I understand this one. Do you mean that there's no RRSIG for that DNSKEY record? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se