To:
Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@nlnetlabs.nl>
Cc:
Ulrich Wisser <liste@publisher.de>, EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date:
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:33:03 +0100
Authentication-Results:
ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-Reply-To:
<201001191208.o0JC8d7b003705@bartok.nlnetlabs.nl>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] new epp commands?
.SE is a thick registry, which means you have the data in reality both in the registry and the registar. Anything that can help ensuring the two databases are in sync is a good thing. So yes, I would support such a command be standardized. Patrik On 19 jan 2010, at 13.08, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > My two cents in-line > > here at .SE many registrars asked for lists of their > domains/hosts/contacts. Obviously there are no commands in the standard > to extract lists of objects from the epp server. > > These registrars don't have an administration on there own? > > Before proposing new commands I'd like to ask why there aren't any such > commands? Has it been a deliberate decision or didn't just nobody ask > for it? > > It has been deliberate not to turn EPP into yet another whois > protocol. Also, not all registries do have this data because not > all are "thick registries". > > jaap > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details > send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se