To:
"'Patrik Fältström'" <paf@cisco.com>, "'Ulrich Wisser'" <liste@publisher.de>
Cc:
"'EPP Provreg'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Michael Young" <myoung@ca.afilias.info>
Date:
Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:54:31 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<D7DFDAD8-FCC6-4ECF-9CAE-3CBF4221162A@cisco.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
Acp9buZ4d7KupsA8QNOQJE879ROV7QAFsZfw
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] draft-gould-rfc4310bis-00.txt Submitted forReview
Makes sense to me. Michael Young -----Original Message----- From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:32 AM To: Ulrich Wisser Cc: EPP Provreg Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] draft-gould-rfc4310bis-00.txt Submitted forReview On 14 dec 2009, at 21.20, Ulrich Wisser wrote: >> I propose adding the zero or more case to the draft for secDNS:chg. Please respond to the list or to me privately if you support this or don’t support this along with any reasons. > > It does make life easier for many web application programmers. So I would like to second that change. I also think this is needed, or as I said earlier, any mechanism that make it easy for someone that do _not_ support 4310 to at least remove the DS data in the registry. Patrik -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se