To:
Ulrich Wisser <liste@publisher.de>
Cc:
EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
=?windows-1252?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@cisco.com>
Date:
Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:32:08 +0100
Authentication-Results:
rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-Reply-To:
<4B269E26.8090103@publisher.de>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] draft-gould-rfc4310bis-00.txt Submitted forReview
On 14 dec 2009, at 21.20, Ulrich Wisser wrote: >> I propose adding the zero or more case to the draft for secDNS:chg. Please respond to the list or to me privately if you support this or don’t support this along with any reasons. > > It does make life easier for many web application programmers. So I would like to second that change. I also think this is needed, or as I said earlier, any mechanism that make it easy for someone that do _not_ support 4310 to at least remove the DS data in the registry. Patrik -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se