Re: [ietf-provreg] Anyone working on 4310-bis?

[Ulrich Wisser <liste@publisher.de>]

After going through our epp server code I believe we should go for the
*not* backward compatible changes. In my opinion supporting another
extension on the server side is if not trivial at least very easy.
Server operators are always free to support the old namespace as long as
necessary but anybody doing a new implementation would get it right from
the beginning.

Andrew, if we change the namespace version number servers can support
the old way without any changes to the clients and the new (proper) way
at the same time.

In that light I propose we drop backward compatibility.

/Ulrich


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se