To:
EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Date:
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:54:15 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<65C7AD75-F057-46B8-B275-54098AD9A4C2@afilias.info>
Mail-Followup-To:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>,EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Anyone working on 4310-bis?
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:45:03AM -0600, Howard Eland wrote: > Another reason I like this option is that it gives the registry the > ability to maintain some consistency in not only the DS record RDATA, > but also the DS record TTL. What is the value in having similar TTLs on the DS in the parent and the DNSKEY in the child? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se