To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
CC:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:34:26 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07025DAE2B@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Document Progression?
Scott, I'm not opposed to progressing the current set. Eric Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > It's been 16 months since RFCs 4930 - 4934 were published as Draft > Standards in May 2007. Is anyone interested in seeing the document set > advance to Standard status? We've long since passed the minimum > requirements for consideration described in RFC 2026: > > "A specification shall remain at the Draft Standard level for at least > four (4) months, or until at least one IETF meeting has occurred, > whichever comes later." > > -Scott- > > > >