To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@Neustar.biz>
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:08:42 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07025DAE2B@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Document Progression?
I think acheiving Full Standard would be a worthy goal. Certainly no roadblocks to it from our experience. I'm curious - have there been fresh deployments of EPP since Draft Standard? At 8:25 -0400 9/24/08, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >It's been 16 months since RFCs 4930 - 4934 were published as Draft >Standards in May 2007. Is anyone interested in seeing the document set >advance to Standard status? We've long since passed the minimum >requirements for consideration described in RFC 2026: > >"A specification shall remain at the Draft Standard level for at least >four (4) months, or until at least one IETF meeting has occurred, >whichever comes later." > >-Scott- -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more.