To:
"Klaus Malorny" <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>, "Alexander Mayrhofer" <axelm@nic.at>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, "Andreas Papst" <andreas.papst@univie.ac.at>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:47:57 -0500
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AccBg9ua25cfqJiFSqiRiCQzEROZAAAHU5Ng
Thread-Topic:
[ietf-provreg] Question regarding contact:disclose behaviour.
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] Question regarding contact:disclose behaviour.
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se > [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se] On Behalf Of Klaus Malorny > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:46 AM > To: Alexander Mayrhofer > Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se; Andreas Papst > Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] Question regarding > contact:disclose behaviour. > > Alexander Mayrhofer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we're moving towards EPP enabling .at, but there is an open question > > regarding how "contact:disclose" should work (we are going > to use that for > > hiding certain elements in a legacy whois service). Section > 2.9 of RFC3733 > > contains the following example about "contact:disclose": > > > > [...] > > > > I'd appreciate feedback on how that was originally > intended, and would like > > to see some clarifying text about this in 3733bis... > > > > Additionally, i'd like to hear from implementors about > their currently > > implemented policy regarding this - i think it would be > very confusing to > > clients if server behave differently... > > > > thanks, > > > > Alex Mayrhofer > > nic.at / enum.at > > > > > Hi Alexander, > > an earlier discussion with Scott revealed to me that the > current approach does > not allow to set the disclosure of one element and the > non-disclosure of another > element at the same time. Maybe this is the same that puzzled you. Within the <contact:disclose> element, that is. The expectation is that the dcp element specifies the default policy (be it disclose or not), and <contact:disclose> specifies the exceptions. It is thus possible, for example, to specify a non-disclosure policy for postal address info using the DCP element while allowing disclosure of an email address using the <contact:disclose> element. -Scott-