To:
"janusz" <janusz@ca.afilias.info>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Thu, 20 Jul 2006 07:33:05 -0400
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
Acap3JljyZnS919xSNev8a3re28LXwCE2How
Thread-Topic:
[ietf-provreg] Summary of Test Matrix Discussions
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] Summary of Test Matrix Discussions
I should note that there's another possibility: we can change the text in the document to say that other info can be provided in the <value> element. That's something to consider if implementers are finding more value (no pun intended) in returning info other than XML elements. -Scott- > -----Original Message----- > From: janusz [mailto:janusz@ca.afilias.info] > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 4:09 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] Summary of Test Matrix Discussions > > I can confirm that Afilias EPP implementation does not return a > client-provided element as described by Klaus. The are plans to phase > out support for the OPTIONAL <value> element in the server > implementation. > > Janusz Sienkiewicz > > Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > >Looking at this issue, can someone from Afilias or NeuStar either > >confirm or deny that their server implementations do not return a > >client-provided element as described by Klaus? I need to remove the > >"X"s if Klaus is correct. > > > >-Scott-