[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Dan Maharry" <dan@mcd.coop>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:39:20 +0100
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
In-Reply-To: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07015E476A@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
thread-index: Acak4z3MBFb4nc7LQO2NDTiv9IQ/swAAxzJgAAAi82A=
Thread-Topic: [ietf-provreg] Which documents to target?
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] Which documents to target?

Fair enough.
When can we expect a bis2 set of documents and could you republish the
address for the current bis1 set please?

Thanks, Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Hollenbeck, Scott [mailto:shollenbeck@verisign.com] 
Sent: 11 July 2006 13:38
To: Dan Maharry; ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] Which documents to target?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se] On Behalf Of Dan Maharry
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:12 AM
> To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: [ietf-provreg] Which documents to target?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just wanted to check whether or not I should be using the RFC3730 -
> 3735 documents to derive the rules for my EPP server from or if I 
> should now use the bis documents once new versions are released by 
> Scott?

My opinion: use the new documents.  They're intended to obsolete the
originals.  Perhaps more importantly, they contain corrections and
clarifications to address issues discovered since the originals were
published as RFCs.

-Scott-
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
This Message has been Scanned by SurfControl(c) Email Filter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------




Home | Date list | Subject list